The Supreme Court's decision on legalizing same-sex marriage
didn't secure a majority vote. However, the Apex Court does acknowledge the
equal rights of queer individuals and advocates for public awareness and
sensitivity. Additionally, the Court has instructed the government to guarantee
non-discrimination and the protection of the queer community.
In a much-awaited judgment, the Supreme Court of India recently delivered a judgment on the legal status of same-sex marriage, a hotly debated issue in the country. The final results of this case became met with bated breath through the Indian populace, as the five-judge bench, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, weighed in on the issue.
Diverse Perspectives on Same-Sex Marriage
The verdict, delivered through this diverse panel, highlighted differing perspectives inside the judiciary on the topic of identical-intercourse marriage. Justices Chandrachud and Kaul vocally supported the rights of the queer community, emphasizing the want for same treatment and protection. However, their stance become in the end overruled by way of the majority judgment passed down by means of the opposite three judges: Justice Bhatt, Justice Hima Kholi, and Justice Narisimbha.
Interpreting Law, Not Making It
Chief Justice Chandrachud, throughout the announcement of the verdict, underlined an important distinction - that the courtroom's position is not to create new laws however rather to interpret current ones. He stated that any adjustments to the legal framework regarding identical-sex marriage should come from the legislative branch, urging Parliament to take into account amending the Special Marriage Act.
Also Read: Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau Extends Warm Navratri Wishes to Hindu Community
Recognising Queer Rights and Preventing Discrimination
While same-intercourse marriage did not secure custodial recognition as a fundamental right in the Constitution, the Supreme Court did now not flip a blind eye to the struggles faced by means of the queer community. The court docket unanimously identified the importance of making sure of equal rights and safety for this marginalized group, and it is known as a broader societal sensitization to prevent discrimination.
Directives for Government Action
In a complete set of directives, the Supreme Court mentioned several crucial steps for each State and the Central authorities:
Non-Discrimination:
The Centre and state governments had been directed to take measures to prevent discrimination in opposition to individuals identifying as queer based totally on their sexual orientation.
Public Sensitization:
The apex courtroom is known for efforts to raise public recognition approximately the rights of the queer community and endorsed organizing a committed hotline to assist them. Chief Justice Chandrachud, in his announcement, emphasised that queerness isn't constrained to city or elite communities but extends to all strata of society, along with the underprivileged.
Police Procedures:
The court docket instructed law enforcement and police agency to conduct a preliminary inquiry earlier than registering a First Information Report (FIR) related to the relationships of queer couples. This directive aimed to save the harassment of queer individuals based totally on their sexual identity.
Autonomy and Choice:
The verdict made it clear that members of the queer community can't be forced to return to their households or go through any shape of hormonal cure.
Intersex Rights:
The Chief Justice directed the authorities to make sure that intersex youngsters are not coerced into undergoing sex change operations, acknowledging the importance of safeguarding their rights.
In summary
While the verdict did not immediately achieve the legalization of same-sex marriage, it underscored a commitment to equal rights and protection for the queer community. It marks a significant milestone in the ongoing quest for inclusivity and serves as a catalyst for change, fostering a more welcoming and diverse society in India. The Supreme Court's directives hold the potential to pave the way for legislative changes, ultimately creating a more equitable legal framework for all citizens.
0 Comments